Carer/Guardian From Naivety to Advocacy: Addressing the Silent Epidemic of Childhood Trauma in Western Sydney

DrSamJoplin

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
The Importance of Working in Underprivileged Communities
During my internship, a professor shared an anecdote that has stayed with me. He said, "We give the impossible cases to the interns because they're hopelessly naïve." He went on to explain a perspective that was in less cynical: the unwavering dedication of interns to complex cases that other clinicians see as "lost causes" may ironically provide the best possible chance for efficacy in treatment. The very same professor also advised my colleagues and I not to immediately move to affluent suburbs but instead to go to communities that truly needed our help. He emphasised that this would be the best training we could ever receive, and after following his advice diligently, I wholeheartedly agree.

Working with Children in the Western Suburbs of Sydney
As a registrar, I had the privilege of working with children who presented with a wide range of complex and demanding psychiatric and behavioural issues. These children were located in the western suburbs of Sydney, an area that has been marked by socioeconomic challenges and adversity. This community has been deeply affected by various hardships, including poverty, limited resources, and high levels of trauma.

Unfortunately, it was common for children to come to the service with cumulative adverse childhood experiences, such as abuse, neglect, and disrupted family relationships. These experiences have profound and long-lasting effects on their emotional well-being, cognitive development, and social functioning. As a registrar, working with these children and families had long-lasting effects on me too.

Within this socio-demographic area, the hardship of these children is tragically commonplace. Many mental health workers are exhausted, leading to complacency. The welfare system is overburdened and desensitized to the challenges these complicated children face. Schools and police too often label them as delinquents, failing to understand the underlying trauma that drives their problematic behaviour.

These children face unique challenges, including complex psychiatric presentations, ongoing concerns within their familial dynamics, insecure caregiver arrangements, multiple comorbidities, and extensive trauma histories. Furthermore, their caregivers often experience extreme burnout, with a lack of systemic and institutional support exacerbating the situation. Coupled with a negligent lack of much-needed intervention from government services, these children are perpetually retraumatised.

Statistics on Early Childhood Trauma in Australia
In Australia, the prevalence of childhood trauma is also concerning. According to the Australian Institute of Family Studies, an estimated 42,000 children experienced substantiated abuse or neglect in 2019-2020. This includes physical, sexual, emotional abuse, as well as neglectful behaviours. These numbers highlight the urgent need for effective interventions and support systems for children who have endured such trauma within the Australian context.

Emotional and Financial Implications
The consequences of early childhood trauma extend beyond emotional and psychological well-being. Providing congregate care, such as residential treatment centres, is significantly more costly than standard foster care. The financial burden placed on the system underscores the need to find effective ways to address and resolve the effects of trauma, not only for the sake of the children but also to alleviate the strain on resources.

Investing in effective interventions and support for children with complex needs and their foster carers is not only a matter of social responsibility; it also makes sound economic sense. The societal costs associated with caring for these children are considerable. An example from New South Wales (NSW), Australia, highlights this issue and offers insights into how alternative models could yield significant systemic savings.

In 2016, the NSW government funded a two-year trial of a program, Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO), delivered by the private not-for-profit company, OzChild. The government committed $4.87 million to this program, which was designed to provide specialized care for children with complex needs who were experiencing multiple placement breakdowns or unable to move from residential to foster care due to behavioural and emotional problems.

During this period, approximately 30 children between the ages of seven and 17 were placed in this six-12 month program, with specialist carers receiving a tax-free reimbursement of up to $75,000 per year. This amount was expected to cover most of the child’s daily needs. OzChild, one of NSW’s largest out-of-home care providers, had previously run this program successfully in Victoria.

However, the broader context in which this initiative was introduced underscores the magnitude of the challenge. In NSW alone, there were approximately 20,000 children in out-of-home care, and demand was projected to require an additional 660 foster carers within the following year. This demand was largely driven by children with complex needs, who required a level of support that was not adequately covered by the standard carer allowance payments. Furthermore, an independent report into child protection in NSW painted a grim picture of an ineffective, unsustainable, and crisis-driven system that was failing to improve long-term outcomes for children and families with complex needs. The escalating costs were largely due to the increasing proportion of children in out-of-home care, which had grown since the government began outsourcing responsibility to non-government organisations (NGOs).

The report found that the average cost of caring for a child through an NGO was $41,000, while the cost for a child in the care of the Family and Community Services (FACS) was $27,000. More than half of the children in care were being cared for by NGOs and were staying in care longer. This situation was primarily due to the allocation of funding, with the bulk of resources going towards out-of-home care rather than proactive measures to address family needs earlier.

Investing in more effective interventions and comprehensive support for foster carers could help reduce the costs associated with longer-term residential care, multiple placement breakdowns, and the wider social impacts of failing to adequately support these children. By providing more targeted resources and specialist support, it may be possible to improve outcomes for children with complex needs, reduce the burden on the care system, and ultimately save society significant costs in the long run. However, it is also clear that more research is needed to evaluate the long-term impacts of such programs and to explore how they can be scaled up to support more children and carers.

Importance of Effective Coordination and Liaison
My experiences working with children who had experienced trauma have been invaluable, and formative to my deep interest in developmental trauma, attachment, and providing intensive case management and liaison services for children with complex psychiatric presentations. Working in this community allowed me to witness firsthand the resilience and strength of these children and their caregivers, despite the adversities they faced. It also highlighted the urgent need for specialised services and intensive case management to effectively meet their unique needs. Collaboration with schools, child protection services, community organisations, and other healthcare professionals is of critical importance in providing comprehensive and holistic care for these children.

Promoting Discussion and Education
Early childhood trauma is a significant public health issue with far-reaching consequences for the individual child, their family, and society as a whole. In order to effectively address this issue, it is crucial to identify and treat the impacts of trauma at an early stage, to provide supportive and nurturing environments for all children, and to ensure that those who have experienced trauma have access to appropriate therapeutic resources. While the therapeutic approaches outlined above can all play a role in this process, further research and investment are necessary to advance our understanding of the most effective interventions and to expand their availability.

In addition, a systemic approach to improving foster care support and remuneration can both enhance the well-being of these children and bring about considerable economic benefits by reducing the longer-term societal costs associated with childhood trauma. It is clear that addressing childhood trauma is not only an ethical obligation but also a smart economic decision, underlining the urgent need for society to prioritise these issues and commit to meaningful action.

Understanding the complexities of developmental trauma is crucial for carers, guardians, mental health workers, psychologists, and foster carers in Australia. By fostering open dialogue and knowledge sharing, we can collectively work towards improving the well-being of children in foster care who have experienced attachment issues.

Let's continue this important conversation and explore strategies to support these children effectively.